Welcome
BerlikLaw is a results-driven, AV-rated law firm specializing in business litigation, defamation law, and the resolution of business disputes. Located in Reston and with additional client meeting locations throughout Northern Virginia and the District of Columbia, the firm handles complex commercial litigation, libel and slander issues, intellectual property disputes, non-compete claims, business torts, and all forms of civil litigation. The firm offers counseling and advice on ways to avoid litigation, including innovative legal solutions and strategies, but when your business is left with no reasonable alternative but to pursue or defend litigation or arbitration, BerlikLaw is the firm you want in your corner.The firm's sole owner and member, Lee E. Berlik, has teamed up with various "of counsel" attorneys to assist individuals and businesses based in Fairfax County, Loudoun County, Alexandria, and Northern Virginia, and are frequently involved in cases pending in other Virginia jurisdictions such as Richmond and Norfolk. Berlik and his affiliated lawyers serve clients from meeting space in Reston, Tysons Corner, Alexandria, and Leesburg, at locations convenient to the area's state and federal courthouses.
For over 17 years, commercial litigator and defamation lawyer Lee Berlik has been providing effective representation for individuals and business owners throughout Virginia. Having spent most of his career with large law firms employing 500-750 attorneys, Lee decided he could offer his clients increased responsiveness, greater value, and better service by opening his own law firm devoted to meeting client objectives and achieving results at a minimum of expense. That firm is BerlikLaw.
Lee has earned a reputation as not only a highly effective Virginia trial lawyer, but one who understands and appreciates the need for efficiency and litigation cost control. The firm keeps its overhead low by, among other things, using highly skilled, experienced contract attorneys, allowing the firm to strategically manage its fluctuating caseload without the need to pay inflated salaries. Such practices allow the firm's attorneys to charge rates that are but a tiny fraction of what these same attorneys charged at their former "Big Law" firms.
Our lawyers appear regularly in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (a highly efficient federal court known as the "rocket docket"), as well as in circuit courts throughout Virginia, both as lead counsel and local counsel. Our diverse practice includes breach-of-contract disputes, trademark infringement litigation, copyright enforcement, trade-secret protection, defamation, fraud, discrimination claims, and many other areas that commonly affect small and large business alike.Here at BerlikLaw, we are committed to protecting the interests of our clients with diligence, promptness, and zeal. Give us a call, and get the representation your business needs without breaking the bank.
Consult an Attorney
Case Results
CASE RESULTS DEPEND ON A VARIETY OF FACTORS UNIQUE TO EACH CASE AND DO NOT PREDICT OR GUARANTEE SIMILAR RESULTS IN FUTURE CASES.
- Won $1.1 million jury verdict against world’s largest management-software company
- Successfully defeated $3.2 million lawsuit against international corporation.
Virginia Business Litigation Lawyer Blog
- Recent ADA Guidelines on How to Treat Applicants and Employees with Cancer or Intellectual Disabilities While most people know that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) protects employees who have obvious visual, hearing, and physical impairments, ....
- Removal, Rather Than Procedural Gamesmanship, Is How to Secure Federal Forum The Fourth Circuit clarified last week that after a case is filed in state court, a defendant desiring a federal forum should seek removal rather than ....
- Prior to Derivative Suit, Shareholder Demand Must Clearly Identify Wrong and Demand Action A shareholder acting on behalf of a corporation may bring a "derivative suit" against corporate directors and management for fraud, mismanagement, ....
The Virginia Defamation Law Blog
- Not Every Website Is Entitled to Section 230 Immunity Section 230(c)(1) of the Communications Decency Act is intended to immunize providers of interactive computer services against liability arising from ....
- Lost Profits Caused by Defamation Must Be Proven with Competent Evidence On May 31, 2013, the Fourth Circuit reversed a $4 million verdict against U.S. Bancorp for defamation, finding that the amount was excessive and/or ....
- This Is Why Exact Words Must Be Pleaded Defamation claims carry a particularity requirement, though the degree of particularity required is not as high as with fraud claims. While it is not ....





